ARTICLES 

Browse through our library, search by title or filter by topic.

Statistical Look at Mobile Deposit Duplicates and Losses

Allowing customers to deposit checks by taking a photo with a smartphone or tablet (mobile deposit) opened a new avenue for fraud. Unlike depositing a check at the ATM or at the teller line, the consumer keeps the physical check after depositing it via a mobile device. The customer could try to negotiate the deposited check a second time, on purpose or by accident. To mitigate loss exposure from duplicates, financial institutions apply holds on checks and set limits on mobile deposit capture usage.

According to remotedepositcapture.com’s Second Annual mRDC Industry Study, despite original fears to the contrary, Mobile Deposit is a “homerun”. An overwhelming majority of FIs participating in this year’s survey (76%) had not experienced any losses from mRDC. Of those FIs that reported losses, 47% said the amounts were so small that they did not require changes in policies or procedures.

However, while fraud losses have been low, financial institutions have higher costs in other areas due to duplicates caused by mobile deposit. These costs fall into the following areas:

  • New technology to identify and prevent checks from paying against their customers’ account more than once
  • Additional operational resources to research and adjust duplicates
  • Write off of non-fraud adjustments

Filter by Topic(select one)

  • ACH Payments

    Who manages the ACH Network? What is same-day ACH and is it mandatory?...

  • Check Imaging

    Are checks going away in the US? What are other countries doing with paper checks?...

  • Receivables

    What are the current trends with consumer bill payments?  How will the USPS changes affect us?...

  • Risk Management

    Is payments fraud on the rise? Where are the highest risks and what can we do?...

  • Payments Infrastructure

    What are the latest scanner introductions? Is a Virtual Environment right for me?...